1. The Defendants are each indicated in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1, among the land size of 1369.2 square meters in Seo-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon.

1. Presumed facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of share 2660/13692, among the Daejeon Tae-gu Daejeon-gu G 1369.2m2m2 (hereinafter “instant land”). The Defendants are the owners of share 2660/13692, and the Defendants are the owners of share 1360/13

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendants separate ownership of the instant land by specifying each location and area. Of the instant land, the part on the ship (c) part (c) and 266 square meters (hereinafter “c (c) portion”) connected with each point of the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 are divided ownership by specifying the location and area of the Plaintiff.

[Reasons for Recognition] Confession (Article 150(1) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff and the Defendants were in a mutual title trust relationship with respect to the instant land, and the fact that the instant complaint, stating the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the title trust with respect to the Defendants, reached the Defendants on July 13, 2016, is apparent in the record, and thus, the said mutual title trust relationship with respect to (c) of the instant land was lawfully terminated by the Plaintiff’s declaration of intent to terminate the trust.

Therefore, the Defendants are obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on July 13, 2016 with respect to the same share as that entered by each Defendant in the separate sheet among the items in (c) part to the Plaintiff.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is accepted on the grounds that all the claims are reasonable.