A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of BM truck truck truck trucks.

On February 15, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on February 15, 2017, and changed the lane from the point of 87.4 km to the point of 00 km from the side of the board crossing to the point of 3 km.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by changing the vehicle line in the direction of direction, etc. in order to give notice of change of course, and to properly consider the traffic conditions at the right and right, and to prevent accidents from occurring.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving while driving a four lanes by negligence in the course of duty, thereby driving C(53 tax) by a victim C(53).

D SM520 caused the left side of the driver's seat of the car to the front side of the freight of the Defendant, and the vehicle for SM520, which has lost its balance due to its shock, was placed on the right side of the expressway and went to the first lane, and was driven by the victim E (47 years old) who was driven on the first lane, was able to get the front part of the Fsch Rexton car driven by the Defendant E (47 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, sustained the injury of the victim C, such as the salt, tension, etc. of the shoulder pipe that requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, the injury of the victim E, the injury of the diversous salt and tension that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and the injury of the light and the tension to the victim G who was on the flaston car, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, escaped without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the victim E, to the extent that the victim C-owned market value is scrapped, to the extent that the victim C-owned car is scrapped, and the victim E-owned car is destroyed to the extent that the 1,460,200 won of the repair cost and immediately stopping the car to the extent that it is possible to rescue the life.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E and G, respectively.