1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.

2. Requirements for persons eligible for veteran’s compensation that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on January 17, 2019.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 1995, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on February 28, 2018, and was discharged from military service on February 28, 2018.

B. At around 10:00 on June 20, 208, the Plaintiff: (a) caused the scambling of the upper right fest, damage to human body during the real-time and night infiltration training (hereinafter “the first accident”); (b) around May 2014, the Plaintiff was killed in the patrol course at the military unit patrol (hereinafter “the second accident”); and (c) caused the injury to human body on the upper right fe-hand fe-hand side of the instant accident (hereinafter “the first accident”). (d) around 10:0, the Plaintiff caused the injury of the upper left kne-hand part of the instant accident (hereinafter “the injury between the first and the first accident”) and the Defendant’s injury to the upper left fe-hand side of the instant accident (hereinafter “the injury between the two persons of distinguished service to the State”) and the injury to the Defendant on the ground that the injury occurred to the upper left fe-hand fe-hand side of the Defendant (hereinafter “the injury occurred to the Defendant 3.”).

C. On January 8, 2019, after deliberation and resolution by the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement on January 17, 2019, it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff was injured or injured in the course of performing duties or education and training directly related to the national defense, safety, etc. of the country that suffered from the first or third wounds in light of the following circumstances, and it is difficult to recognize that proximate causal relation with other duties or education and training was caused or aggravated due to reasons not meeting the requirements of a person of distinguished service to the State under the former part of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter “Act on the Honorable Treatment of Persons of Distinguished Service to the State”), and it is confirmed that the Plaintiff was accompanied by a person of distinguished service to the State under the former part of Article 2(1)2 of the Act on Support for Persons of Distinguished Service to the State (hereinafter