A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C, which is the Defendant’s attached to the Defendant located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) was frequently disputed due to the operation with the ordinary victim; and (c) operated a dangerous E- which is a dangerous object, and damaged the restaurant table and the collection equipment, which is the victim’s ownership, to have an amount of KRW 2,00,000,000 for repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 369 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 369 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. The scope of the recommendation on the sentencing guidelines under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the recognition of his/her mistake and reflects the fact that there are no criminal records of the same kind, and the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant) of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended punishment] types 1 of habitually, repeated crime, and special damage (Habitual, repeated crime, special damage, etc.) of the mitigated area (4 months to 10 months), (special mitigated persons) of the mitigated area (special mitigated persons) of the mitigated area (special mitigated persons) is determined as ordered for the reasons that the punishment is not imposed.