A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 12. 27. 12:30 경 김해시 C에 있는 피해자 D 운영의 E 호프집 앞 도로 상에서 피해 자가 피고인과 동업으로 위 호프집을 운영하면서 그 수익금을 제대로 정산해 주지 않는다는 이유로 화가 나 위험한 물건인 피고인 소유의 F 포터 초장 축 슈퍼 캡 트럭을 운전하여 위 호프집 출입문을 향해 돌진하여 이를 손괴하려 하였으나 호프집 입구에 설치되어 있는 약 30cm 높이의 턱에 위 트럭 앞 바퀴가 부딪히면서 펑크가 나는 바람에 더 이상 진행하지 못하자 위 트럭에서 내려 발로 위 출입문을 수회 걷어찼으나 출입문이 부서지지 않아 그 뜻을 이루지 못하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 371, 369 (1), and 366 of the Criminal Act (the fact of attempted destruction of special property and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. Where the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation] habitually, repeated crimes, special damage [the person subject to special mitigation] in the mitigated area (4 to 10 months) and actual damage is minor (the decision subject to special mitigation] (the decision subject to sentence] of the Defendant’s crime of this case is intended to drive a truck to go up to the victim, and thus, the risk of crime is small, but actual damage does not occur, and the Defendant does not have any other criminal history in addition to one fine for the last ten years, and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, etc. are comprehensively determined as indicated in the order, and the sentence is suspended only once. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.