Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years and six months, and by imprisonment for not more than four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On December 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered approximately eight grams of philophones, a local mental medicine, in a promotion airport in China, around December 2, 2016; (b) divided them into two parts; and (c) embarked on the Defendant’s home and entered the Incheon International Airport via around 15:30 of the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant imported philophones even though he is not a narcotics handler.

B. On December 2016, 2016, the Defendant committed the crime of taking and selling phiphonephones. On December 2016, 2016, the Defendant sent approximately 1.5g of philophones imported into B, as described in paragraph 1(a), at the trade influence room located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu (Seoul), with approximately 1.5g of philophones imported.

Accordingly, the defendant received philophones even though he is not a narcotics handler.

2) On December 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sent approximately 4g of the penphones imported into B, as described in paragraph 1(a), from the trade influence room located in Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul lockeddong; (b) 2016, the Defendant sent approximately 1g of the penphones imported to B.

Accordingly, the defendant received philophones even though he is not a narcotics handler.

3) On January 2017, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed Haman on January 1, 2017, at the Defendant’s house located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment 102 dong 505, 1.5g of the penphonephones imported closely as described in paragraph 1, and (b) sent approximately 1.5g of the penphones imported into B; and (c) 1.5 million won from B.

Accordingly, even though the defendant is not a narcotics handler, he traded phiphones.

4) On March 2017, the Defendant committed a crime in March 2017, 2017, 10.5g of the philopon imported as described in paragraph (a) 1 at the Defendant’s residence, which was 0.5g of the philopon imported as described in paragraph (a).

Accordingly, the defendant received philophones even though he is not a narcotics handler.

2. On March 2017, Defendant B received approximately 0.5g 0.5g of chophones from A at the residence of a patrolman A.

Accordingly, the Defendant is narcotics.