1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, including, but not limited to, the following, the reasons for this Court’s explanation. As such, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third [founded Grounds for Recognition] A. 45 through 50] is added to the column, and the same [founded Grounds for Recognition] and the same 8th 6th son's "this court" is added to the first instance court.

A. At the end of 6th 8th 8th am, according to the Plaintiff’s advisory opinion, the Plaintiff’s advisory opinion does not need to be hospitalized, and the Plaintiff’s advisory opinion does not constitute the number of days of hospitalization as stated in 3-48 days, 4-4 days, 5 days from the number of days of hospitalization as stated in 51, 70, 700, 700, 9-H hospital (paid 1,000, 3100, 2700, 100, 100, 11, and 12-I hospital’s 48 days, 9-4 days from the number of days of hospitalization as stated in 2, 90, 700, 7-7, 8-9, 9-10, 100, 100, 300, 100, 100, 100, 50,000, 10,000.

를 추가함. 제10쪽 1행 다음에 ‘⑪ 그 밖에 입원은 단순히 환자가 원한다고 하여 이루어지는 것이 아니라 담당의사가 입원 치료를 할 필요성이 있는지를 판단하여 이루어지는 것이므로 담당의사가 전문가로서 입원을 결정하였다면 특별한 사정이 없는 한 일응 입원의 필요성이 있었던 것으로 보아야 하고, 입원의 필요성을 사후적인 판단으로 일률적으로 정하기 어렵다.’를 추가함. 제10쪽 8행의 ‘원고가 제출한 증거만으로’를 ‘원고가 제출한 증거 및 앞서 인정된 사실만으로’로 고쳐

A. 2. Conclusion