The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Around January 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) found the Defendant’s instant charges from the restaurant C, operated by the Defendant in Yangju-si, as a customer, to be a victim E (47 taxes, inn) of the victim, flusium, and flusium, and flusium, in which the salter and flusium were flusium, and the toilet was flusium, and suffered injury, such as buckbucks, to the flusium, flusium, etc., 4 weeks of 4 weeks of buckbucks, in which the Defendant flusium and flu

2. We examine the judgment. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the victim on September 13, 2017, which was after the institution of the public prosecution in this case, submitted a written agreement that he would not want punishment against the defendant. Thus, the public prosecution in this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.