beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 700,000.
The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 8, 2015, Defendant A appeared as a witness of the instant case of occupational embezzlement against E, the said court’s 2015 High Court Decision 2015 and 2703, around May 8, 2015.
In the examination of the above case, the defendant 120,000 won per day and the F will pay 80,000 won per day when he requested two of the above persons to help them work.
The defendant and F had attempted soup construction as the defendant and F had been made as the defendant and F knew of such content.
“I are aware of the case” in the attorney’s question.
This case shall be asked at once.
This person's day-to-day basis
The answer to "," and the person shall be asked to see.
He answer to the question of the attorney-at-law, “I would like to ask the question of the attorney-at-law, “(B) and the Corporation,” and “I would like to ask the question of the attorney-at-law, “the construction business operator test.”
The answer is that the daily allowance is 80,000 won for that day and 10,000 won for E, and 120,000 out for E, respectively.
“To this end,” the attorney-at-law’s question “satisfys and talks.”
The statement was made to the effect that the constructor paid KRW 120,000 per day to E, such as the answer to “.”
However, in fact, although E, a village leader, requested a village soup construction work, it was directly managed by E, and B was performed with daily payment from E, and therefore, B did not have to pay KRW 120,000 per day to E, and there was no fact that B did not directly say that E’s daily payment was KRW 120,000.
Since basic facts are identical and there is no substantial disadvantage in exercising the defendant's right to defend, the facts constituting the crime against the defendant A without changing the indictment are recognized as above.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
2. Defendant B. The Defendant