207 Highest 4188 Violation of Attorney-at-Law

20(521)

Movingwon

October 30, 2008

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months. Two days of detention days prior to the pronouncement of this judgment shall be included in the above sentence. The amount of nine thousand won shall be collected from the defendant.

Criminal facts

On April 2005, the Defendant received a request from A for the release of a female under detention due to a traffic accident in drinking water, and the Defendant received a request from A for the release of a female under detention due to the accident of a drinking water.

The defendant was provided to A with "I am to be released without any bitle between a judge of the Daegu District Court and his well-knownness," and the defendant was immediately provided with KRW 1 million as school expenses, KRW 3 million around April 8, 2005, KRW 5 million around May 10, 2005, and KRW 2 million around May 2005, respectively, and received KRW 9,200,000 on the same four occasions. Accordingly, the defendant was provided with money and valuables by a public official to make a solicitation on the case to be handled by him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to A and C;

1. A copy of a bankbook;

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Subparagraph 1 of Article 109 of the Attorney-at-Law Act

1. Selection of punishment;

Imprisonment Selection

1. Calculation of days of detention;

Article 57 of the Criminal Act

1. Additional collection:

Article 116 of the Attorney-at-Law Act provides that the defendant has nine criminal records, including the previous criminal records of fraud and four times (including one sentence of imprisonment), and the criminal records of fraud, which have been punished in 2001 (including the criminal records of fraud, which have been punished in 2001, by taking account of all the sentencing factors indicated in the instant case, including the fact that the criminal records of fraud and the fact that the criminal records of fraud have not been fulfilled together with the interest if the defendant lent money to engage in credit card business (including the fact that the defendant, despite the absence of the judge known from the beginning, is the fact that the judge knows that there was a judge who knows from the beginning), and that the complainant has not returned at all the amount of the school expense of this case.

Judges Laos