logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.02 2016고단2514
위증교사등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than four months and by imprisonment for not more than ten months for the crimes of No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records】

1. On April 8, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Goyang Branch of the District Court for the Defendant’s Goyang Branch for a two-year period, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 16, 2009.

2. On November 30, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years in one year and two months of imprisonment with labor due to the alteration of official documents at the Seoul Central District Court on November 30, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 8, 201.

[2] The Defendant is a person who actually operated (ju) D for the purpose of clothing distribution business, etc., and E is a person who worked as an employee of the Defendant from November 2007 to June 2010.

1. The Defendant changed official document to an official document: (a) sold the clothing bearing a trademark of “POLO”, which is a fake product illegally produced in the place of the Philippines, to the seller; and (b) intended to alter the certificate of import declaration under the name of the head of the Incheon Airport Customs Office, which is an official document, in order to be as if the clothing seller was actually imported in the United States.

At the end of March 2009, the Defendant attached the three floor D offices in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, to the “PHIL.R” portion of the “PHHHHL.R” portion of the “PHHHHL.R” portion of the “PHHHL.R.” which was received from the U.S. head office prior to the import of the product into fluories from the U.S. head office to the copy of the import declaration.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the defendant revised one copy of the import declaration under the name of the head of Incheon Airport customs office, which is an official document.

2. Around the time under the preceding paragraph, the Defendant exercised a copy of a copy of the original import declaration (number G) on October 27, 2008, which was modified at the customer office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, as if he had been aware of the alteration, as if he had been genuine.

3. On April 16, 2010, the Defendant: (a) imported fakes with a trademark imported from the Philippines as a real representative of “(State)” against the Defendant on April 16, 2010; (b) sold and possessed them; and (c) sold and possessed them.

arrow