logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.01.16 2019고합696
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

6 (No. 3) Handphone smoking tools seized, one certificate of philophone medication apparatus.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics as a foreigner of the nationality of Thailand (the name “B”), the Defendant treated psychotropic drugs, as follows: (a) Melopon (the name “philopon”; and (b) Melopon (hereinafter “philopon”).

1. The Defendant, along with pro-Gaon C (C, Epiced “D”), had the mind to keep a phiphone in Thailand. On October 2019, the Defendant had the mind to take charge of ordering a phiphone to a person with no name in Thailand and remitting the sales price, and C had the mind to take charge of receiving the money in Korea.

On October 7, 2019, the Defendant: (a) transferred the purchase price to the person under whose name the name the beneficiary was in fact, and (b) had the person under whose name the name the beneficiary was in fact sent approximately 30 g of opphones to the Republic of Korea through air special grade mail (E); and (c) had the above flight special grade mail arrive at the Incheon National Port located in the Jung-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government Port on October 8, 2019; and (d) C received the above flight special grade mail at around 12:00 on October 14, 2019 at its own residence located in Pyeongtaek-si F Building G.

Accordingly, the defendant imported philophones in collusion with C.

2. On October 14, 2019, the Defendant dypon medication with C and H, and around October 14, 2019, at the residence of the above C around 18:00, the Defendant dypon medication was dyponed with C and H, and dyponed by inserting the dypon volume of the dypphone, such as paragraph (1), by heating it into a glass bar, and dyponing it.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with C and H, administered philophones.

3. On November 2019, the Defendant, along with H, decided to contact H with the third party (i.e., the second party (i., the second party), who was a mobile phone app, and (ii) purchase the penphone. The Defendant sent H KRW 600,000 to the third party (i.e., the second party) around the 16th to 17th day of the same month, and H, on the same day, issued the order of the said “I” in the vicinity of the Defendant’s residence located in the Seoul Jung-gu building Jgu, Seoul. H, with the third party (i.e., the third party) who was under the direction of the said “I,” and (ii) the latter 2g of the penphone.

arrow