logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.07.17 2019노569
존속살해등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seventeen years.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (the imprisonment of 22 years) on the Defendant is too unreasonable.

B. The prosecutor (unfair punishment) sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (22 years of imprisonment) is too unhued and unfair.

2. The crime of this case is a planned crime in which the Defendant, who claimed the Defendant’s excessive debt, purchased the Defendant’s attempted to commit the crime in advance, and the victim gets away the victim’s life by dusting and putting the saves around it in the toilet.

The Defendant killed the victim by closing the door, without taking relief measures, such as informing the victim of the fire, by leaving the scene of the crime, only by a mixed person without any image location, immediately after being able to leave the scene of the crime.

From the date of the instant crime to the date of arrest, the Defendant tried to conceal the instant crime as a suicide of the victim by making a statement to investigative agencies, victims’ words, creditors to suggest the suicide of the victim, sending text messages, etc.

The victims suffered big slick pain, such as the husband's accident, divorce with her husband, and the death of her children, which is economically difficult, and have been dedicated to the defendant's debt up to several million won on behalf of her husband. Even before the crime of this case, prior to the crime of this case, the defendant was dedicated to the defendant by working at a restaurant as an employee in order to repay the defendant's debt newly known to her employee. However, due to the crime of this case by the defendant, she seems to have suffered serious images in telegraph and suffered severe physical and mental distress.

This is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake.

The defendant is the first offender who has no previous criminal record.

The victim's words, omissions, daughters, and the mother of the defendant.

arrow