logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.13 2014고합776
현존건조물방화치상
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was from August 2012 to run a middle-term household sales business with the victim F along with the trade name of “G” in the warehouse located in Chungcheongnam-si from the victim F.

On September 21, 2013, at the office located in a warehouse around 21:30 on September 21, 2013, the Defendant had a dispute with the victim due to the problem of lodging and lodging in the fund management and warehouse.

The Defendant listened to the horses from the victim that “I am in a warehouse after this string, I am on the floor of the office,” and spread a thinn which he was in custody in the warehouse.

The victim has prevented the victim from putting him and removed him from the defendant, and the defendant fireed him by putting him into the crepan floor by spreading the crepan, and caused the victim to move his crepane to the body of the victim with a fire attached to the crepan, and caused the victim to suffer approximately 12 weeks of heart 2 pictures in need of treatment over 15% of the physical surface, such as face and body crepan.

2. Although the Defendant, at the time and place specified in the facts charged, had a dispute over F and money management, board and lodging issues, etc., there is no fact that he/she spreads a width on the floor of the office.

당시 발생한 화재는 말다툼 중 화가 난 F이 의자에 앉아 있던 피고인의 등에 시너를 붓고 불을 질러 발생한 것이고, 피고인은 불을 끄기 위해 바닥을 뒹굴다가 F이 계속해서 피고인의 몸에 시너를 뿌리는 것을 보고 정신을 잃었을 뿐이다.

3. Among the facts charged in the judgment, direct evidence that corresponds to the fact that a person who spawns and spawns in the office is the defendant is only a statement made at an investigative agency and this court.

However, considering the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, F’s statement is difficult to believe, and the remaining evidence alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged.

arrow