A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 11, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes”) went into the entrance of the above toilet for the purpose of cutting away the body of an unspecified male who is viewed as a melting side from the entrance of the above toilet to the second common side.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on public toilets for the purpose of meeting his sexual desire.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (using and photographing cameras, etc.), took the face, face, and sexual description of the victim M (a name) who was committing self-defense in the first column, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1.

Accordingly, the defendant taken the body of the victim who could cause sexual humiliation or shame by using a mechanical device similar to the camera, against his will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to M;

1. Photographss, etc. by capturing a shot of the skin;

1. Application of the reporting Acts and subordinate statutes as a result of digital evidence analysis;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, Article 12 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, Article 14(1) (a) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and the Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and Article 16(4) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes are not good in light of the method and content of the crime of this case, and the defendant has a record of criminal punishment by fines for the same crime (the above case is currently pending in the appellate court trial), and the defendant shall be punished by a letter from the victim.