logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.11.08 2018고단435
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The gist of the facts charged was that the Defendant was engaged in collecting and selling the amount of cell phone waste.

person is a person.

A. around August 2015, the Defendant was guilty of KRW 30 million of the investment amount: (a) at a mutual influent drinking house located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; and (b) at the victim B (25 years of age), the Defendant was able to make a lot of profits by selling the phone after accepting the volume of the mobile phone closure; and (c) there is insufficient funds.

The principal shall be guaranteed on the face of the closed cash purchase fund, and the monthly payment will be paid a certain amount as interest.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in the process of accepting the closedness, the Defendant did not have to purchase the closed value, which is a raw material, on the wind continuously left by the enemy because the poor rate is high, and not only did not have office operating expenses, but also could reduce the bad rate even if he/she again runs the business by purchasing the closed value, even if he/she received money from the injured party due to the bad condition, he/she did not have an intention or ability to return the principal properly or to pay the profits.

Around September 1, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, received 30 million won as investment money from the national bank account in the name of the Defendant through the national bank account in the name of the Defendant from the victim.

B. On September 2015, 2015, 10 million won, the Defendant borrowed money to the above victim with no money to be used for the party’s personal purpose by using the money to purchase the closed amount. The Defendant would be able to repay the money to the above victim with the money borrowed.

“A false statement” was made.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not properly proceed with the business and did not make profits, and even if the Defendant borrowed money from the damaged party due to the failure to pay the bank loans of KRW 30 million and its interest, it did not have the intent or ability to pay the money properly.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is under the name of the defendant around September 23, 2015 from the victim.

arrow