1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

3. The identification of the defendant of the judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the first instance court’s ruling “Plaintiff” at the last two pages of the second instance judgment shall be deemed to be “Plaintiff’s husband B”; (b) the second part of the second part of the third part shall be deemed to be “No. 17, 2013”; and (c) the third part, “C, etc.” at the third part shall be deemed to be “D, etc.”; and (b) the third part shall be deemed to be the same as the reasoning for the judgment of the first instance; and therefore, (c) this shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. As such, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed, and the "Korea Electric Power Corporation" in the defendant's indication of the judgment of the court of first instance is obvious that it is a clerical error in the "Korea Electric Power Corporation", and it is so decided as per Disposition