logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2014.12.10 2014가단15914
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b) KRW 1,160,000 and as regards it, November 2014.

Reasons

1. On November 30, 2006, the indication C of the claim leased the instant apartment to the Defendant with a deposit of KRW 1 million, KRW 270,000,000 per month, and two years for lease period, and the order building entered in the order (hereinafter “instant apartment”). The Plaintiff had acquired the ownership of the instant apartment due to division of property on April 14, 201. However, the Defendant terminated the said lease by serving the instant complaint as the delivery of the instant complaint, since it did not pay rent from December 30, 2013, the Defendant delivered the instant apartment to the Plaintiff and returned unjust enrichment of the instant rent and the rent.

2. Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act).

arrow