Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and four months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a year.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

On January 13, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to one year by the Changwon District Court for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on November 4, 2016.

1. Defendant A

A. A. The Defendant administered a cropopon (hereinafter “cropopon”) by means of dilutioning approximately 0.03g of a cropopon into the Defendant’s arms on February 15, 2017 at a so set soup room located in 09:00 around 09:0 on around 15, 2017, both around 0.03g of a cropopon into water and using a single cropopter.

B. The Defendant provided philophones by dilutioning approximately 0.03g of philophones with water at the above date, time, place, and providing philophones in a way of injecting B’s arms free of charge using a disposable injection device.

(c)

On February 15, 2017, the Defendant possessed approximately 0.18g of philophonephones by dividing approximately 0.13g of philophones into a white paper, and 0.18g of philophones by dividing them into a single type.

2. Defendant B’s above person

1.(b) At the same time, at a place as referred to in paragraph (b), A administered phiphones by requiring A to injection of 0.03 grams on the Defendant’s arms as above.

"2017 Highest 1117"

3. On December 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) injectedd approximately 0.03g of a fluoric mental medicine catise (hereinafter “one-time caton”) with a single-use injection device; and (b) administered the product to I for injection with the Defendant’s arms at around 22:00, mid- to 2016, at the home of the H and the second floor of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; and (c) injected the product to I using a single-use injection device.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 542"

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each response to a request for appraisal;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Previous convictions in the judgment: References to criminal history and investigation reports (Confirmation of the date of release of a suspect A recently) 2017 Heights 117;

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to I;

1. Each request for appraisal shall be made;