logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.06.22 2017가단62578
위자료
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 15 million to the Plaintiff; and (b) 5% per annum from November 30, 2017 to June 22, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On August 3, 2010, the Plaintiff related to the parties is a legal action of C in which the report of marriage with Nonparty C was completed. The Defendant is a legal action of D who completed the report of interference with Nonparty D on May 1, 2006, and C and the Defendant are the employees working at the same workplace, and the employees commit unlawful acts as follows.

B. Cheating (1) C and the Defendant knew of the existence of their spouse to each other, and D, around November 2015, confirmed the location of the Defendant and C, who are one’s own wife, through a vehicle black box, and directed the Defendant, and the Defendant confirmed the fact that C and C were keyed to D.

(2) Around December 2015, D sent C text messages referring to the unfoldion with the Defendant, and referring to a mixture of abusives, and C sent D text messages referring to “The fact that it was unfolded in the complex gate concept and did not have any end, but is too extreme,” and C sent D text messages.

(3) 한편, 피고는 D와 원고가 피고와 C 사이의 부정행위를 인식한 이후인 2015. 12. 25.경에도 피고에게 ‘자기 내남자다 내꺼야~♡’는 등의 내용이 포함된 이메일을 보내기도 하였다.

C. After the progress of the relevant case and the current status of the original and the Defendant’s family, D filed a lawsuit against D against C for damages on the ground of an unlawful act between C and the Defendant as the court 2017da589, and this court rendered a judgment around April 26, 2018 that “C shall pay D KRW 15 million and its delay damages,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

(2) On the other hand, the Plaintiff and the Defendant maintain their respective marital life at the time of the closing of the instant argument.

【Ground for Recognition: Facts that there is no dispute between the parties or is not clearly disputed, entry of Gap evidence 1 through Gap evidence 3, and the purport of the whole facts and arguments in this court】

2. Determination on the cause of the claim.

arrow