1. The Defendant’s refusal to disclose information on February 21, 2017 to the Plaintiff as indicated in paragraph 1 of the Attached Table 1.

Details of the disposition

The term of entrustment: 3 years from the date of entrustment; 5,908,00,00 won: Public announcement of the actual results; evaluation and announcement - Public announcement period: November 21, 2016 to 30. (40 days); and the date of receipt of proposals: January 3, 2017 (by no later than 09:0-18:00 on January 9, 2017; - The method of drawing members: the proposer directly (7): the holding of the Evaluation Committee; the public announcement of the evaluation results: the method of selecting 15:0 on January 11, 2017; the public announcement of 200 square meters; the method of calculating the actual results; the public announcement of the evaluation results; the public announcement of the evaluation results on January 11, 2017; the public announcement of the evaluation results; the public announcement of the evaluation results; the public announcement of the evaluation results; the public announcement of the evaluation results; the public announcement of the evaluation results; the public announcement of the evaluation results; the public announcement of the evaluation results;

(A) No. 1, 2) The main contents of the notice are as follows:

The Plaintiff and EXE (hereinafter “EXE”) submitted a proposal for the instant recruitment to the Defendant, and seven evaluation members including D who were selected as an evaluation members of the instant recruitment were assessed on January 10, 2017 by the Proposal Evaluation Committee as 967.92, and 967.57, respectively.

(A) The evaluation score for the plaintiff is the second point of view on the ground that the proposal submitted by the plaintiff includes four pages.

(A) Evidence No. 9-3). The defendant selected X-ray as a priority bidder on January 11, 2017.