The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. On August 14, 2018, the Defendant found in order to voluntarily surrenders to the police station on the ground that he taken narcotics, etc. on or around 02:10 of 2018, and found that he had been mixed in the first floor of the Seoul East-gu Police Station located in approximately 21-ro 29, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, on the ground that the police officer B, a female police officer, worked in the police station located in the police station, and demanded the above police officer to lend his mobile phone to the police officer, and make a warning of the rupture.

In order to prevent a police officer from leaving the watchkeeping room out of the watchkeeping room, the police officer tried to locked the entrance door of the watchkeeping room, and the police officer, who saw the threat, assaulted the police officer in such a way as to prevent the police officer from getting off the two arms of the above police officer by using a general telephone device, "I must see to get off another police officer," and forced him to cut off the phone gun by force, and prevent him from getting off the arms of the above police officer by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on duty at night by police officers.

B. The Defendant is a indecent act by compulsion.

at the same time and at the same place as subsection (1).

In the same way as the victim C(n, 28 years of age) was towed by the two arms of the victim C(n, 28 years of age) so as to restrain the victim from resisting, the victim was able to get the defendant out of the office, and the victim was pushed the victim out with a glass wall of the civil petition room, and the victim was able to get the shoulder of the victim by hand, and the victim's body was populated into the victim's body.

The defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

2. Determination

A. In the case of an insane under Article 10(1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant legal doctrine, the mentally defective person, who lacks the ability to reasonably distinguish between the malicious and trial cost of an object, or lacks the ability to make a decision, i.e., to control his/her act by determining whether he/she is intended to distinguish an object from that of an object.