logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.12 2016고단492
자격모용사문서작성등
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the exercise of private documents prepared for qualification.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C The authorized management body is C's management body located in the authorized area D in Suwon-si, and on May 9, 2012, held a temporary management group meeting and elected the defendant and E as a joint manager.

However, the above assembly has a serious defect that infringes on the right to vote of the other sectional owners, and the Suwon District Court's decision on September 6, 2012, 2012 that held the defendant and E as a joint manager in the case of application for a disposition.

“The Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the content of “.”

On January 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) drafted a written agreement with G representative director H, a corporation G office located in Suwon-si F, which performed C’s management duties; (b) settled accounts of KRW 292,56,540 in G Co., Ltd.; (c) stated “A” as “A: (d) affix the Defendant’s seal on the Defendant’s name; and (c) affix the Defendant’s seal on the name side; and (d) affix the Defendant’s seal on the C’s representative seal on the C’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant prepared a letter of agreement, which is a private document on rights and obligations, with the recognition of the representative qualification of C Authorized Management Group.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made to I by the police;

1. A written agreement;

1. Documents of the decision on disposal of the price of gold bullion 2012 Canada 306, the Suwon District Court 2012Kahap 365, the objection to provisional disposition, and the objection to provisional disposition Seoul High Court 2012Ra 1638;

1. Decision of 24852 rendered by means of handy paper 2012 jointly;

1. The application of the statutes of the Seoul High Court 2014Na 26356, such as the return of unjust enrichment;

1. Relevant Article 232 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. Penalty of one million won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement [The defendant denies the crime of this case, but the defendant denies the crime of this case].

arrow