1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① "a tortfeasor" in Chapter 3, Chapter 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "one illegal act"; the "suspects" in Chapter 4, Chapter 14, and Chapter 15 through 16 shall be deemed as "users"; and the "operation" in Chapter 4, Chapter 15 shall be deemed as "operation"; ② the five pages 8 through 11 shall be used as follows; ③ "a dispute" in Chapter 5, Chapter 14 shall be deemed as "a dispute" in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be cited as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except that the date of the judgment of the court of first instance, the date of the decision of the court of first instance, the date of the decision of the court of first instance, the date of which the court of first instance, which is deemed reasonable to dispute" in Chapter 5, shall be deemed as "a dispute".

[Supplementary measures taken by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology to improve the academic affairs of some professors of the relevant university on or around September 2009, and thus, the president of the relevant university did not dispute between the parties, as a result of the investigation into the actual condition of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, and Technology, where an employer or a supervisor of the relevant affairs on behalf of the employer under Article 756 of the Civil Act has paid considerable attention to the appointment and supervision of the relevant employee or causes damage to the employee even if he/she has paid considerable attention to the appointment and supervision of the relevant employee, but such circumstance must be asserted and proved by the employer, etc. (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2003Da6835, Apr. 9, 2004; 97Da58538, May 15, 1998).