logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 07. 14. 선고 2011두8017 판결
(심리불속행) 취득가액 계산시 부지조성비 인정여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Gwangju High Court (former District Court) 2010Nu783 ( October 28, 2011)

Case Number of the previous trial

early 208 Mine1758 (No. 18, 2009)

Title

(C) Whether the land development cost is recognized in calculating the acquisition price;

Summary

As a result of confirming the cost of creating a gas station, the value verified by the tax authority is legitimate.

Cases

2011Du8017 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

XX Kim

Defendant-Appellee

O Head of tax office

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju High Court ( Jeonju) Decision 2010Nu783 Decided March 28, 2011

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of trial without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissal of final appeal by judgment without continuing the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see this case, e.g.,

arrow