A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 320 "

1. On October 6, 2016, the Defendant in violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act would be able to obtain a loan of KRW 33,00,000 if he/she opened a passbook and provides a password with a phone from a “D” office operated by the Defendant in Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, and provides a password to the Defendant.

“In contact with the purport that the Defendant was “,” and had a mind to transfer the passbook of the Defendant.

At around the 8th day of the same month, the Defendant sent each physical card connected to the Defendant’s name (E), the national bank account (F), and the corporate bank account (G) in front of the apartment apartment of the “MM Mcoping,” which is located in the 1st day of Kimcheon-si, through Kwikset service, and sent the access media for electronic financial transactions to the name-free person by informing him of the password of the above account’s password.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the electronic financial transaction access media.

2. The Defendant, while operating the “D” in Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, Seongbuk-gun, owned 65 chips, which are materials for chiping 90,750,000 won in total.

On October 25, 2016, the above goods were seized by the original copy of the decision of seizure of the movable properties by the said court No. 1546 of the Daegu District Court, which was delegated by the creditor H in the above D around October 25, 2016, and the execution officer I attached the above goods by the original copy of the decision of seizure of the movable properties by the said court.

around 10:00 on October 29, 2016, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the above court, transferred 10 chips, which are chips, from among the seized articles, to Jingu located outside the jurisdiction of the above execution officer without obtaining permission from the above court.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the attachment indication that a public official performed in relation to his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made against H, K, and L;

1. Documents of decision, records of seizure of tangible properties, and records of inspection of seized properties;

1. The new data on bank replies, the detailed statement of each entry into and departure from a bank, and the application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes.