A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the actual operator of C corporation.

1. From January 29, 2015, enforcement officers D belonging to the Seoul Southern District Court attached to the crime on June 2015, 2015, at around 12:15, with the delegation of the execution of creditor F from Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E and 1008, the above court’s provisional attachment order for corporeal movables No. 16, but at least 17 points listed in the attached list of crimes, such as C-owned computers, was provisionally seized and affixed a seizure mark on the goods.

However, on June 2015, the defendant moved the seized object to Gyeyang-gu G without the approval of the enforcement officer.

As a result, the Defendant concealed the attachment indication that a public official performed in relation to his duties, thereby impairing the effectiveness of the attachment indication.

2. From the end of November 3, 2015, enforcement officers of the Seoul Southern District Court’s District Court’s judgment No. 13:30 on the crime committed at the end of the end of the year 2015: (a) delegated the enforcement of creditor F by Seoyang-gu G on November 13, 2015; and (b) attached a back-to-date vibration 26,550,000, total market value of C owned by the said court based on the original text of the judgment No. 148 of the said court’s judgment No. 2015 group 148; and (c) attached a seizure mark on the goods.

However, from November 3, 2015 to December 15, 2015, the Defendant released the above seized objects against the Defendant without an execution officer’s approval.

As a result, the Defendant concealed the attachment indication that a public official performed in relation to his duties, thereby impairing the effectiveness of the attachment indication.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the date of the third public trial shall be the date);

1. Each police statement made to I and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint, certified copy of a corporate registry, A name box, protocol of provisional seizure of movable properties, protocol of seizure of movable properties (Evidence 10) and protocol of inspection of seized objects;

1. Relevant Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act Article 62(1) requires the corresponding punishment in light of the frequency of crimes and the value of concealed seized articles.

However, the defendant.