logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.01.25 2017고정1330
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D hospital in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government is a hospital operated normally, such as facilitating entry into, discharge from, and unauthorized going out of, the so-called office hospital, and absence of substantive hospitalized treatment.

From May 8, 2014 to May 29, 2014, the Defendant was hospitalized in the said D Hospital and received treatment for 22 days, and on June 9, 2014, the Defendant did not have received substantial hospitalized treatment, including that the Defendant had not received a doctor’s medical treatment. As such, the Defendant deceptioned the victim as above and received insurance money of KRW 660,000 from the victim on June 9, 2014, and received KRW 19,376,206 in total over 25 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table from the time of deception to June 21, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol and copy of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The secretary general of the D Hospital and the judgment of doctor;

1. Investigation report (verification of related cases and actual conditions of D hospitals);

1. Recording records of each examination of witnesses of E, F, and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the analysis of the records of payment of insurance companies;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the defendant and defense counsel have a need to be hospitalized;

One of the arguments is that the defendant did not have any record of treatment, such as surgery, in relation to the relevant vindication before and after the date of the crime in this case, the fact that the contents of the hospitalization accident exceeded a bicycle, or that it was about to avoid a stove, or that it was about to go beyond a stairs, etc., and that he did not perform a stove or an operation.

arrow