Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 6. 26. 18:10 경 충주시 B에 있는, C 식당 내에서 ‘ 땡 중이 와서 욕하고 행패를 부린다.

“A person who embling a 112 report and dispatched to the site” to a restaurant proprietor E in the Chungcheong Police Station D and patrolman.

"A person who was asked as "I" and "A person who was frightened in frighten," and "A person who was reported as frightened in frighten.

The Defendant, when he presents a police officer’s identification card, notifies his position and name, and demands a police officer to disclose his personal information, and the Defendant should not inform the police officer E of his identity as the victim, among three owners, including the owners outside the restaurant, who were in the restaurant, and other unspecified people in the vicinity of the restaurant.

"Publicly insultingly insultingly insultingly speaking as a large interest."

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. The criminal defendant asserts that the defendant had previously been assaulted by police officers, including the victim, and that the police officers dispatched to the scene of the instant case were humped, but the police officers were not able to feel hump at the scene of the instant case.

However, even if the contents of the defendant's assertion can be recognized as facts, since there is no obstacle to the establishment of the offense of insult in the judgment, the defendant's assertion is rejected.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to have resulted in a criminal act resulting from contingent judgment while the defendant contests another customer in a restaurant. The defendant has been convicted of a single suspended sentence, but the defendant has been convicted of a fine for 1979, and the latter has only been convicted of a fine, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc. are included.