logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.07.01 2015고단3942
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(성적목적공공장소침입)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Each of the facts charged

A. On October 26, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes”) stated in the victim E’s indictment that stolen the appearance of ‘D’ in front of the front of the public toilet in Songpa-gu Seoul, Seoul, on the ground that women stolen the appearance of ‘D’ from the front of the public toilet in front of the public toilet in Songpa-gu, Seoul, and then sealed the toilet window into the left side, and then one’s face was pushed back into the toilet window in front of the three-year-old face, and the victim E (n.e., 28 years of age) who was reporting the Hah and Hah from the outside of the toilet, and stated it in the victim E’s indictment that “F” in order to restrain the victim’s behavior. However, this is clear that it is clear that it is an error in the e-mail (the same shall apply to any additional charge).

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on public toilets to satisfy his sexual desire.

B. The Defendant attempted to take advantage of the victim E (the 28 years old) who was her face in front of the toilet screen (the 28 years old) and the victim F (the 30 years old), who was her desireed to escape from and her mouth from the toilet screen by pushing ahead her face to the left side, on the date and time set forth in the preceding paragraph, and thought that women her being drunk at the place under the influence of alcohol at the place under the influence of alcohol. However, in order to avoid the Defendant’s action, the Defendant tried to take away the above window again, “A must,” and opened the window again, and the victim E was able to take advantage of the window again while opening the toilet again from the toilet. In order to prevent the Defendant’s action, the Defendant took advantage of the 3-4 years old.

This is the defendant.

arrow