The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the complaint for CD branch offices, the issuing company of telephone number copies.

In May 2012, the Defendant’s credit damage: (a) at the office of the above C branch office of Chuncheon-si, Inc., Ltd., the Defendant: (b) there was no fact that the victim FF Co., Ltd., the issuer of the competing phone number, and the victim H operating “G”, who was its store, did not withdraw advertising fees without permission from its customers; and (c) there was a case of damage that was reported around June 13, 2012 by the private phone number companies to withdraw advertising fees without permission; (d) there was a need for careful attention when advertising in the telephone number business; and (e) there was a broadcast with the content that the victims without permission withdraw advertising fees and cause damage to the advertiser; (b) notwithstanding the fact that the victims were being broadcasted, the victims, including the advertiser, to the effect that there was damage to the advertiser by withdrawing the advertising fees without permission; and (c) there was no fact that the victims’ online calls, sending text messagess, visits, or smartphone flasc.

B. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victims by damaging the credibility of the victims at the same time and in the same manner as that of the preceding paragraph, thereby interfering with the victims’ business.

2. Determination

A. 1) The crime of undermining credit under Article 313 of the Criminal Act requires that a person’s credit should be damaged by spreading false facts or by using other fraudulent means. Here, “credit” refers to an economic credit, i.e., a person’s ability to pay money or intent to pay money (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2004Do1313, May 25, 2006).