Defendant

A A Fine of 500,000 won, Defendant B of 300,000 won, Defendant C of 50,000 won, and Defendant C of 50,000 won.

Criminal facts

1. Defendant F: (a) around 16:00 on October 7, 2017, around 16:00, the Defendant: (b) provided three tables and three cards and fire fighting cards on the ground floor of H commercial housing in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (c) provided 9 persons, including A, with a paint and card, for gambling and gambling, and received KRW 2,000 per hour per food, etc. while providing the stuffs with convenience, such as food.

Accordingly, the defendant set up a place for gambling for profit-making purposes.

2. Defendant A, B, C, and D had 3 points at the time and place described in paragraph 1, and had 10 won per store, and had 100 won per store scam scam.

3. Defendant E, along with Defendant E, she saw several saws using the 51 Chapter 51 Chapter 1 using the same method as the date, time, place, etc. described in paragraph 1 (2) at the place, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

A. Defendant A, B, C, and D: The main text of Article 246(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant F: Article 247 of the Criminal Act (Optional to the punishment)

1. Attraction of workhouses: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Confiscation: Article 48(1)1 and 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. A provisional payment order: The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the scope of the gambling in this case; and (b) the Defendants’ criminal records and existence of the same kind of force, etc.; and (c) the sentence is determined as per the order.