logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단3898
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor by obstructing the performance of official duties at the Seoul Central District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the original prison on February 28, 2018.

The Defendant, around 06:06 on September 2, 2018, 2018, she was boarding with the boarding of the victim B ( South and 44 years old) at the street near the 248-ro, Seongbuk-gu Seoul Eastern Office, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, with the boarding of the victim B (V) at C-si that was driven by the Defendant, and she was under the influence of the following alcohol to the victim “

“If there is a internal house,” the taxi engineer will be “if you will do so,” and the victim will no longer drive.

“Affort Defendant 1’s act of driving a horse at the above taxi, but the victim cannot pay the taxi fee and continued his/her behavior.

After that day, the Defendant: (a) driven the above taxi and stopped at the parking lot of the Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Police Station in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul on the same day; (b) expressed the victim’s desire to be “a taxi driver rings”, “a dog”, and “a dog” in the above taxi; (c) took the victim’s back from the taxi following the victim who gets off the taxi at the taxi; and (d) took the victim’s left face one time by drinking the victim’s hand; and (d) assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s seat one time with the hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A report on investigation (explosion of witness as a counter of a shot);

1. Investigation report (prior conviction and confirmation of repeated crime), status of confinement for each individual, and application of the statutes of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, and again commits a repeated crime during the period of the repeated crime, and the victim is punished.

However, the defendant is recognized as committing a crime, is in depth and is not serious.

arrow