Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by a fine of thirty million won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On November 27, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (hereinafter “The Punishment of Minor Offenses Act”) did not pay 8,900 won of taxi charges without justifiable grounds despite having arrived at the root of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun Police Station located in the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Police Station located in approximately 21:29,00,00, while boarding a private taxi operated by the victim B at the seat of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Police Station, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Seoul, on the same day, around 23:20 on the same day.
2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties on November 27, 2016 and around 23:25, on the road near the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “Sevine fewfew” (hereinafter “Sewfewfewfe”) is recommended by police officers E and F to pay the fare, who were dispatched after receiving 112 reports.
“A person who assaults the appearance of 3-4 times of drinking to the face of the above E,” which read “a person who produces any money from his or her opening.”
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.
3. Defluence;
A. The Defendant’s insult of the victim E is whether the victim “a Chewing identification card of the Chewing test” is given to the victim in front of the victim’s seeing that he was a taxi article B when and at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, frighting to drinking from the victim E;
Eargue test, “Argue tye such sarsens, sarsens, sarsens, flazines
The victim openly insultingd the victim by referring to the abusive language, such as “a dog, dog,” etc.
B. The Defendant’s insult against the Victim F was found in the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and the victim F taken a dynamic image of the Defendant’s assault and abusive behavior by the Defendant, and the victim was deemed to be a taxi engineer B.
p) Doesra;
The year of bitch bitch bitch, the same year as bitch bitch bitch bitch, grow up
The victim publicly insultingd the victim by “,” etc.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Each police statement made with respect to E, B, and F;
1. Application of the laws and regulations governing voice recording files 1.