1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C is a doctor who operates the Defendant medical corporation B (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) located in Daegu-gu, Seogu, and the Plaintiff is a person who underwent an operation at the Defendant hospital.

B. Around August 2012, the Plaintiff sleeped a pain on both sides, and took vertebrate surgery at the Defendant Hospital, and slicked the pains of the Defendant Hospital to the right side. However, the Plaintiff got a surgery at the Defendant Hospital again around September of the same year due to the aggravation of the pains of the left side.

However, around January 2013, 2013, the pains of the alleviated right side has deteriorated, and again, the defendant C, a doctor belonging to the defendant hospital, had undergone an operation at the defendant hospital (hereinafter referred to as the "the instant operation"), which was conducted by the defendant C, a doctor belonging to the defendant hospital, lost consciousness and transferred to the Yongnam University Hospital.

At present, the plaintiff is an incomplete horse condition that is not in both sides.

[Reasons for Recognition] The absence of dispute, the result of the court's commission of physical appraisal to the director of Yong-Namnam University Hospital Hospital, the purport of the entire argument

2. Determination on this safety defense

A. As to the defendants' defense, the plaintiff argued that the defendant C is liable to pay the plaintiff a total of KRW 90,626,943 in damages to each of the plaintiff as the defendant C's employer as the defendant C's employer (as the defendant's employer (as the defendant's employer 103,237,156 won in nursing expenses, KRW 42,545,510 in the future treatment expenses of KRW 39,471,220 in the future treatment expenses of KRW 50% in the amount of KRW 40,00,00 in the amount of KRW 42,00,00 in the amount of KRW 50,00 in the term of KRW 42,00 in the case of the plaintiff's medical personnel in the defendant's medical personnel who performed the operation of this case) and damages for delay. Accordingly, the defendant's lawsuit is unlawful as it was filed in violation of the agreement to institute the lawsuit in this case.

According to the purport of the entire pleadings, the Plaintiff’s husband E, on behalf of the Plaintiff, found the Defendant Hospital on November 8, 2013, according to each of the Plaintiff’s evidence Nos. 1, 1, and 1 (including the branch number).