The judgment of the first instance, including the claims added at the trial court, shall be modified as follows:

Defendant C shall be the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. In seven times from 2015 to 2016, Defendant B contracted each construction work in the “original contractor” column from the indicated companies in the following table, and concluded each subcontract with Defendant C on each of the following dates as to each of the fire-fighting construction work.

Of the subcontract price (including value-added tax) E (main D projects for the main contractor, the prime contractor shall be the 1,200,00 G (L) building remodeling and installation works for the main contractor, on September 15, 2015, 11,200,00 G (F) building remodeling and installation works for the main contractor, on April 18, 2016, 16, 165,000 G (L) construction works for the main contractor, on April 165, 200,00 G (P) 160,000,00 G (ju), electricity, communication, fire fighting, (I building, 6,60,000,000 from May 16, 2016, 10, 16, 200, 16, 207, 207, 16, 200, 16, 206, 16,06, 16,06, 2,06,

B. The Plaintiff, according to the contract negotiations with Defendant C, partially performed each of the above fire-fighting construction works. On January 201, 2017, the Plaintiff and the Defendant C prepared the “field status” (Evidence A No. 1; hereinafter “instant site status”) as follows and signed on the end of the document, respectively.

The construction site name contract (including value added tax) project (including 197,000,000,000 60,000,000 50% of the final amount (including 197,000,000) of the construction site (including 197,000,000) project (including 2,000,000) project cost for the construction site, 40,000 7,600,000 2,000,000 for the second 2,000,000,000 1,90,000,000, 2,000,000 or 1,000,000 or 1,000,000,90,000, 18,000, 000, 000, 00, 300, 008, 300, 008, 008, 000.