1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From June 21, 2000, the Plaintiff is serving as a guard in the Suwon District Court B branch from Suwon District Court to the present day.

B. On July 4, 2007, the Plaintiff asserted that he/she sustained injuries, such as the relevant climatic base and tension, the climatic base and tension, the climatic base and tension, the he/she has been engaged in climatic climatics accompanied by the relevant climatic disease (L3-4, 4-5), and the climatic climatics accompanied by the relevant climatic disease (L3-4, 4-5), and the climatic 4-5, 5-6 conical signboard escape certificate, etc. on January 24, 201. The Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for distinguished service to the State.

C. On May 29, 2012, on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation between the above injury and the accident of this case, the Defendant is deemed to be the “disposition of this case’s disposition” which was rendered to the Plaintiff on May 29, 2012.

[The facts that there is no dispute over the basis for recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.]

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Prior to the Plaintiff’s assertion, the instant disposition was unlawful on the premise that there was no causal link between the instant wound and the performance of official duties, since the Plaintiff suffered from the disease, such as the fluorite, tension and tension between the fluoral fluoral, Hansung fluoral fluoral, Han fluoral fluoral, and fluoral fluoral fluoral, etc., but the instant wound and the form were different.

B. (1) Determination refers to a public official’s injury or disease caused by official duty as referred to in the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State.

Therefore, in order to be the difference between the above provision and its injury or disease, there should be a proximate causal relationship between the performance of duties and the injury or disease, and in relation to the causal relationship between the performance of duties, etc. and the injury, it is argued.