A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2016, around 00:15, the Defendant visited C and C with a taxi driver, while under the influence of alcohol, and visited F boxes of Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Police Station in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul.

Defendant G’s assistant inspector G, who was working for a situation at the police box, is about to help the police officer perform his/her duty.

In the sense of “A”, “Cropty gue Ambro shall be discarded.”

2. The head of Si/Gun/Gu stated that the head of Si/Gun/Gu had a bath, . . . . . . 2. . . . . .. ..

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in a lawsuit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the police statement protocol to G;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] There is no basic area (from June to January 4) (the person subject to special sentencing) [the decision of sentencing] [the defendant is the first offender, the defendant is in depth against the mistake, and the defendant's occupation and living relationship are considered as a whole.