A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 14, 2015, at around 20:25, the Defendant received the report of 112 that the Defendant satisfing the Defendant’s satisfing in the “D Call Tech” located in the second underground of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, and tried to verify the circumstances of the instant case by the F of the police box affiliated with the Seoul Eastdong-gu Police Station Esatf, which was called out, the Defendant’s satisfing the F.

C. The death is imprisonment with prison labor.

In doing so, this Chewing theory, she tried to catch the left shoulder of the F in his/her hand, and assaulted the F in his/her own way on the back side, such as using the back side of the F in his/her own way.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (from June to one year and four months) (the person subject to special sentencing) (the decision of sentence / the person subject to special sentencing) (the decision of sentence / the person subject to special sentencing)] of the basic area (the defendant reflects the defendant's wrong, there is no record of being punished due to the obstruction of the performance of official duties, and there is no record of being punished due to the obstruction of the defendant's criminal records and living relations, etc