logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 (창원) 2020.02.19 2019노259
강간상해등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Of the facts charged in this case, around January 13, 2019.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

misunderstanding of facts 1-A.

Although there is a fact that the defendant threatened D with knife and assaults against the victim B among special violence, there is no fact that the victim B (hereinafter referred to as the "victim") who was snifeed by the knife.

The statements made by D and the victim that correspond to this part of the facts charged are not reliable.

1-2.

With respect to the special threat of navigation, there is no fact that the defendant forced the victim to stop the vehicle on board by interfering with the course of the victim, D, or E by using the vehicle he operated, and the victim forced the vehicle of the defendant to leave the vehicle, and intimidation the victim with the knife.

The statements made by D and the victim that correspond to this part of the facts charged are not reliable.

On November 30, 2018, the Defendant visited the AI sick room of the same hospital as the victim, around November 30, 2018. On the facts charged, around November 30, 2018, the Defendant provided meals at the hospital resting room by not later than 23:00 on the same day.

After completing meals, the defendant talks that the victim will move from a female-only ward to a single person room, but the victim was unable to move the sick room, and thereafter the victim's sick room also moved to a sick room, so the nurse and a vagabonds were punished, but the victim did not assault it.

The victim's statement that corresponds to this part of the facts charged is not reliable.

On December 14, 2018, the Defendant borrowed business funds from the victim’s mother, H (hereinafter “H”), and opened a party room with the victim. However, the Defendant’s mother (hereinafter “AD”) and the Defendant’s outer third village AO (hereinafter “AO”) are money.

arrow