logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.24 2019고단5040
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On October 8, 1994, at around 06:08, the driver C of the Defendant’s charge, as the driver of the d refratter, violated the above restriction of traffic by operating the 1.1 ton of the d refratator, which was operated in excess of 1.1 ton of the d refratator, even though the local government of the 312-line dratator was a place where the passage of more than 10 ton of the dratator was restricted on the d

2. The grounds for Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Dec. 29, 201; Act No. 8976, Dec. 29, 201; Act No. 2014, Dec. 29, 201; Act No. 20135, Dec. 25, 2011; Act No.

Thus, the above facts charged constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow