Defendant

A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of eight months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of three years, Defendant D and E, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant B, A, C, and D are the owners of the F apartment G unit G apartment G (hereinafter the above apartment unit D) of the Suwon-gu Busan Metropolitan Government (hereinafter the above apartment unit), Defendant A is a person who has a close relationship with the mother of the above B, and Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and four months for fraud, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on May 25, 2017 and was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and four months for the same year.

6.2. The above judgment has become final and conclusive, and Defendant D is a post-middleer of the above C’s middle school.

1. On November 2015, the Defendants: (a) made a fake tenant and obtained a loan from a financial institution; and (b) cancelled the three primary right established on the said apartment (total debt amounting to KRW 179 million and KRW 210 million in total; and (c) offered to obtain a loan as security for the said apartment at the coffee shop, which does not know of the first nearby trade name in Busan, Jin-gu, Busan; and (d) cancelled the three primary right established on the said apartment (total debt amounting to KRW 179 million and KRW 20 million in total); and (e) offered to obtain a loan as security.

In accordance with the above public offering, Defendant B and D prepared a false lease agreement as if Defendant D paid 230 million won of the deposit money for the lease of the apartment in this case from Defendant B and resided in the office of public office of public office of KJ located in the Nam-gu Busan Metropolitan City on December 8, 198, and as such, Defendant D had paid 230 million won of the deposit money for the lease of the apartment

B. On December 29, 2015, Defendant D paid a deposit of KRW 230 million to a loan consultant M who entered into an entrustment contract with the victim L Ltd., and presented a written lease contract for an apartment that was falsely prepared as if he/she would reside in the above apartment from December 29, 2015 to December 29, 2017, and Defendant B and Defendant D applied for a lease deposit. On December 29, 2015, Defendant B and Defendant D confirmed that the instant apartment was entrusted by the victim and confirmed whether the lessor was the actual director of the lessor and the transfer of the rent according to the contract is properly conducted, and Defendant D moved into the above apartment in the form of Defendant B and Defendant D, but only moved into the above apartment.