logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2015.07.03 2015고단125
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant shall be a public official of Grade VI in local administrative officials who work in Chungcheongnam-do.

1. From 00:45 on February 13, 2015 to 02:15 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) was urged the victim to take out of the victim G (the 34th age), who was under the influence of alcohol at the “F” drinking house located in E in E in the city of official capacity, to take out the disturbance, and to take out the disturbance from the owner of the business; (b) he she was urged to take out from the victim G (the 34 years of age) who was the owner of the business; (c) said two years of these weather; (d) said two years of these years; (d) said public officials of Grade 6 in the Republic of Korea; (d) said public officials of Grade 6 in the Republic of Korea; and (e) said public official’s computer, card terminal, telephone device was sealed into the floor by hand; (d) spiting the Defendant’s money on the floor; and (d) spiting the victim and his employees to take out the victim’s business.

2. The Defendant, at around 02:15 on the same day as the foregoing paragraph (a) above, notified the Defendant of “F” alcohol house, at around 02:15, and notified the Defendant that he will return home to the Defendant by the slope J and the Inspector K of the official police station I district, who was called upon 112 report. However, the Defendant continued to go to go to the business state G and continued to stop it, and the Defendant believed to be “I believe that he will be feasible,” and assaulted the chest part of the slopeJ at least three times on his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G and J;

1. K's letter of self-defense;

1. Certificate of employment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (fields), video CDs (suspects' actions after arrest);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties and the choice of fines) concerning criminal facts;

1. Concurrent Crimes.

arrow