The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. Factual determination of the gist of the grounds for appeal (limited to a case where the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and did not commit an indecent act against the Defendant’s sexual organ against the victim’s sexual organ, but did not commit an indecent act against the victim’s sexual organ. The Defendant’s contact with the victim’s body on his hand does not intend to seek sexual humiliation or satisfaction by expressing the auditor’s mind about aiding and abetting the victim to charge Handphones.) and unreasonable sentencing.

2. Determination

A. We examine ex officio prior to determining the Defendant’s grounds of appeal on the grounds of ex officio determination.

당심에 이르러 검사는 적법한 절차를 거쳐 이 사건 공소사실 중 “피고인을 피해 지나가려는 피해자의 엉덩이 부위를 피고인의 성기 부위로 비비듯이 문질렀다. 계속하여 피고인은 조리실 반대쪽까지 피해자를 �아가 피해자의 손을 잡고 피해자의 엉덩이를 손으로 3~4회 두드려 피해자를 강제추행하였다.”를 “피고인을 피해 지나가려는 피해자의 엉덩이, 허벅지 부위에 피고인의 손을 가져다 대었다. 계속하여 피고인은 조리실 반대쪽까지 피해자를 �아가 피해자의 손을 잡고 피해자의 엉덩이를 손으로 1, 2회 두드려 피해자를 강제추행하였다.”로 변경하는 공소장변경 신청을 하였고 당원이 이를 허가함으로써 심판의 대상이 달라졌으므로, 원심판결은 더 이상 유지될 수 없게 되었다.

However, the Defendant still argued that he did not commit the act of indecent act by compulsion against the changed crime of this case. Thus, the Defendant examined this point below.

B. 1 indecent act on the assertion of mistake of facts is objectively an act that causes sexual humiliation or aversion to the general public and contrary to good sexual morality, and thus infringes on the victim’s sexual freedom, and whether it constitutes such an act is the victim’s intent.