A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 6, 2014, at around 01:05, the Defendant driven a Clearning car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.234% from the 5km section to the road in front of the claim management office located in the same Eup/Myeon located in the same Eup/Myeon from the Do to the Jin-ri located in the same Eup/Myeon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on detection of drivers and reports on the statement of the status of drivers;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is that the defendant is a person who has been punished twice due to drunk driving, and is found to have caused an accident while driving a vehicle again in drinking condition and thus his/her criminal liability is not weak.

However, the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined by taking into account the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected, that the driver's vehicle was disposed of, and that the defendant's age, character and conduct