Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
around 10:00 on April 8, 2018, Defendants specified the initial facts charged as “from 13:00 to 14:00.”
When the victim gives testimony at court, he/she presented the image taken by the Hand, and confirmed the information, and "10:06 :06 :06 :00 p.m."
Defendant
There is no dispute that A goes beyond the fence itself.
Since there is no concern that the exercise of the accused's right of defense may be seriously disadvantaged, the time is recognized as 10 o'clock in 10 o'clock
From the end of the victim D's house located in Jung-Eup City, the defendants installed the iron fence with the directors on the way that the defendants used as a usual passage. However, the defendant Eul set up the wall and set up the bridge on the wall, and the defendant Eul went into the above Madro, and extracted 15,000,000 won of the market price of the victim's possession, which was planted by the defendant A, and extracted 20,000 won of the 75,000 won of the market price of the victim's possession.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to damage the victim's property.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Legal statement of witness D;
1. On-site photographs of the head of a complaint or damage to property;
1. Determination as to the Defendants’ assertion of the video CD
1. The summary of the assertion is that Defendant A was in a state of mental disorder or mental disability as a dementia patient, and he was extracted only to the extent of 1% tree.
It is not the damage of property because the victim was depthd on the same day, and the tree extracted from the same day re-exploit.
Defendant
B only the defendant A sawd at the victim's house.
2. The victim D is in the fixed garden on the day of the case.
Defendant
A observed the Defendants from the time they go beyond the wall to the bridge.
Since the defendants are older and the dispute is continuing due to land, the victim has affixed a photograph and maintained the defendant's behavior while accompanying the defendant A.
Defendant A is the victim's image.