logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2019.07.04 2019고정18
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is a C&A promotion commissioner, Defendant B is a head of C&A, and the victim D(57 years of age) is a person opposing C&A.

On February 2, 2018, at around 21:10, the Defendants came to know that the victim distributed promotional materials of the content opposing the redevelopment C, and Defendant B became aware of the distribution of promotional materials of the content opposing the redevelopment C, and Defendant A had the face of the victim at hand, and Defendant A had the face of the victim two times by hand.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put up the victim about about 14 days of treatment, such as the impairment of the character of face that needs to be treated for about 14 days.

2. The summary of the Defendants and their defense counsel's assertion is that Defendant A, at the time of the time, kidles the side in front of the victim, and the victim kidds the side of the left hand by leaving the bank in front of the victim, and Defendant B was able to take the victim's image on his cell phone while the victim was followed by the victim, and the victim was kidsing the victim in front of the victim, and the defendants did not assault the victim.

3. In light of the following circumstances that can be recognized by the records of the instant case, it is difficult to view that the victim’s assertion is more reliable than the Defendants’ assertion, and therefore, it is insufficient to view that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt.

① At the time, the victim deleted the images of the victim’s photographed by Defendant B before the police officer called up with the victim’s report, and, if the Defendants did not file a complaint against the victim, the victim would not file a complaint against the Defendants. In fact, the victim first filed a complaint against the Defendants for the crime of injury to the victim and filed a complaint against the Defendants at the investigation agency.

(2) A victim;

arrow