Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant A is the head of the public relations marketing office of Goyang-si, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-gu.

On October 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) reported that the Victim K, a fixed-term member, is only a victim K, among the two-storys located in the I Training Center located in Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-do on the second floor, the second floor of which he works, the Defendant: (b) “Isk for this year; (c) these two-years; and (d) any books donated to North Kaf, both of which are read.

1.3 years after the date of the completion of the contract, where it is about to do.

In this year, the victim was openly insultingd because he did not refuse to do so, and this year.

Summary of Evidence (Defendant A)

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of each of the legal statements made by the witness K and J (Defendant A);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. Defendant A, in the facts charged, is the head of the public relations marketing office of the H under the Goyang-gu Goyang-gu Goyang-si G; Defendant B is the head of the citizen culture headquarters of the above foundation; Defendant C is the head of the cultural policy office of the above foundation; and Defendant D is the staff of the cultural policy office of the above foundation.

Defendant

At around December 2, 2014, A and B had the review of the budget bill of the Goyang City City Council against H, and had the executives of the Foundation conduct the Lane theory in order to respond to the expected question of the Si Council, Defendant A and B reported to the Si Council and the press that “I am informed of the Si Council” and “I am the Si Council” of the content that “I am the Si Council Ha,” and “I am the me am am am.” The media report was made around December 8, 2014 and the Foundation’s contribution was reduced by the Si Council, and ordered the Defendant C in charge of the audit work to color the informant and the am am.

Accordingly, on December 10, 2014, Defendant C has D, a person in charge of audit and inspection, approve the internal approval document of “A case of conducting a special audit and inspection of the representative director”.