A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From June 2012, the defendant is the general secretary of Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, and manages the neighbor's meeting by receiving the cost of the neighbor's meeting and the repair works from the residents.

On June 2012, the Defendant received KRW 15,00 from around June 2012 to around November 2013, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 1,345,00 from the victim E, D, F, G, H, I, J, and K, the aggregate of KRW 1,475,00 from the neighbor’s neighborhood meeting expenses paid by the Defendant; (b) stored KRW 1,475,00 for the victims; (c) around 29, 201, the sum of KRW 1,475,00 from around 0,00 to around 1,30,000 from around 0,000 to around 20: (d) received remuneration construction cost of KRW 1,00,000 from the victim who is a resident of the above C, from around 20, 2013 to around 20, 1,000,000 from the victim’s daily consumption; and (d) the Defendant’s KRW 1,6,27,3,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement related H;

1. A complaint;

1. Application of each statement of transactions, and copies of bankbooks and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Calculation of the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant returned the full amount of embezzlement to the council of occupants' representatives by Carryover, and some victims borrowed a written application for the punishment of the defendant, and the punishment shall be determined as per the order.