logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2016.05.17 2015고단912
특수절도미수
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. On June 13, 2015, the Defendants, together with the summary of the facts charged, failed to commit an attempted act, with the wind, to the public official E in charge of the office of the new branch of the budget in the new branch of the budget that arrive at the scene after receiving a report from the victim, by mobilization of 5 galle trees equivalent to the total market value of 34,986,000 won owned by the victim budget group D, which was planted at the same time, at around 10:0 on June 13, 2015.

2. The Defendants recognized the fact that they tried to excavate spawn trees owned by the budget group as shown in the instant charges. As such, we examine whether the Defendants intentionally stolen another person’s standing timber or intended to illegally obtain it.

In light of the following circumstances, even though there was a statement between F and G as evidence supporting this, it is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants were guilty of theft of the above probial tree on the basis of the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

A. F and G’s disagreement 1) As to the early situation on June 2015, 2015 when the Defendants first met, F is aware that “F is a road where the Defendants asked the right holder of a tree tree to land and whether the Defendants were in mind of the tree budget group.”

Defendant B would give a friendly and monetary call to Defendant B as a staff member of the Gun Office.

The statement "(Evidence 65 pages of evidence, legal statement, etc.)" is made.

2) G, the mother of F, was in conversation between F and the Defendants in F in the above time and place.

section 3.

In that sense, G said that “F Defendants were not the Republic of Korea,” and that the Defendants were selling trees.

In other words, F goes back to the f's match because it is against why the trees that are not Korea, and the defendants would go back to the match, and one million won.

arrow